In the end what matters more, CONSEQUENCES OR PRINCIPLE

If I will choose in what matters most between consequences or principle, I will choose consequences. Because in reality life we have to break our principle for the sake of our curiousity and having experience doing it we made mistakes and regret comes last in doing such cruelty and being socialize in life. We tackle on how to think that it is right but suddenly its wrong. some person that is close to our life said something to realize our mistakes and to wake up to reality and to change the wrong things that we done and to correct it and to learned to our mistakes. For example after experience awful trauma in choosing your consequence a new you follow up and you focus to your principle because you realize that we are not perfect but we can do our best for a change.

A Perspective: IT Ethics

Moral development explains the development of moral reasoning. For IT professionals like me it guides us in how to decide in a right way. It helps to maintain my ability to analyze every details of the importance of Information Technology and how to create a perfect program. It gives you idea on how to handle time management and how to sequence your time in making schedule and by arranging it step by step to your work and to your needs in life. It talks about personality on how you may judge that surrounds you likewise in a certain situation through the actions of every person and to yourself. It talks about psychological perspectives, it helps us how to develop ourselves to be responsible in a every situation. For example an old lady is trying to cross the street with you, instead of helping her; you just walk by and ignore the old lady. In this given situation We people are aware of what is happening around us but we just pretending to be blind.


In fact one of the maybe the most, elementary of moral principles is that of universality, that is, If something's right for me, it's right for you; if it's wrong for you, it's wrong for me. Any moral code that is even worth looking at has that at its core somehow. But that principle is overwhelmingly disregarded all the time. If you want to run through examples we can easily do it. Take, say, George W. Bush, since he happens to be president. If you apply the standards that we applied to Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg, he'd be hanged. Is it an even conceivable possibility? It's not even discussable. Because we don't apply to ourselves the principles we apply to others. There's a lot of talk about 'terror' and how awful it is. Whose terror? Our terror against them? I mean, is that considered reprehensible? No, it's considered highly moral; it's considered self-defense. Now, their terror against us, that's awful, and terrible. But, to try to rise to the level of becoming a minimal moral agent, and just entering into the domain of moral discourse is very difficult. Because that means accepting the principle of universality. And you can experiment for yourself and see how often that's accepted, either in personal or political life. Very rarely. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_development#Psychological_perspectives)

I.T. as my field of study

As we all know as time goes by our generation is getting in progress. I believe that getting in this course will help me to build my skills not only for my own good future but also to help others. I decided to enter into this course because i wanted to be a computer programmer. Aside from I am a computer gamer I want to explore what really computer is all about. Even when I am in hgh school I really love computer and it helps me to decide to choose this course. I also want to design my own computer game just like other computer programmer they make their own computer games. I know that it is not that easy to be a computer programmer being here in I.T. is difficult but I will do my best not just to pass this course, but to be a good programmer in future.